Case LawHigh Court › Wp/6445/1995 Of Sri Dr. Y.b.chandramohan...

Wp/6445/1995 Of Sri Dr. Y.b.chandramohan Rao v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 09 Sep 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/6445/1995 Of Sri Dr. Y.b.chandramohan Rao v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/6445/1995 Of Sri Dr. Y.b.chandramohan Rao v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2004) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6445 of 1995 Between: Sri Dr. Y.B.Chandramohan Rao, S/o. Sri Vivekanandam. R/o. Avanigadda (V), Krishna. AND ..... PETITIONER 1 The Income Tax Officer, Ward I., Machilipatnam. 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax., Aayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased tocall for the records of the 1st respondent in G.I.R.No.B.792 and the 2nd respondentin H.Qrs.No.II(b)/19/1994.95 dated 26/12/1994 relating to the assessment year1993.94 and issue a writ order or direction more preferably in the nature of Writ ofMandamus and direct the Respondents to accept the revised computation of Incomeas given in the annexure to the Revision/Petition before the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.J.SWAMY (Not present). Counsel for the Respondents : Spl. Govt. Pleader for Commercial Taxes (Notpresent). The Court made the following : ORDER: (per Sri Bilal Nazki, J) Nobody appeared when the matter is called, though it is listedfor dismissal. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution. 9[th] September, 2004. ajr ________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) ____________________(S.ANANDA REDDY, J) To 1 The Income Tax Officer, Ward I., Machilipatnam. 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax., Aayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Spl.G.P. for Commercial Taxes, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T) 4 Two C.D. copies.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan