Wp/6508/2005 Of G.shankar v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Apr 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/6508/2005 Of G.shankar v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/6508/2005 Of G.shankar v. The Dy. Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition shall accordingly stand dismissed. ___________________________ B.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 6508 of 2005
Between:
1 G.Shankar, S/o. Sri Gouraiah, H.No.3-10-316, Mankamma Thota, Karimnagar, A.P.,2 P.Srinivas, S/o. Sri Gangaram, Mankamma Thota, Karimnagar, A.P.
AND
... PETITIONERS
1 The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Unit - 1 (II), 4th Floor, Annex Building, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
3 The Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise, Prohibition and Excise Building, 5th floor, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 4 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Ranga Reddy District.
5 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Hyderabad District.
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, direction or order especially in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the first respondent in calling upon the Superintendents
of Excise and Prohibition in the State of A.P. to produce the demand draftssubmitted by various applicants within 24 hours of the delivery of the judgmentand the Hon'ble High Court of A.P., now pending Writ appeals as illegal,arbitrary and in excess of the powers conferred on the first respondent underthe provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 and consequently direct the ExciseSuperintendent to release the original demand drafts to the various applicantswithout complying with the directions of the first respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioners: M/SRPN ASSOCIATES
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE
The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following:
ORDER:(Per BRSR,J)
Sri R.Raghunandan, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the cause inthis writ petition does not survive requiring any further adjudication.
The writ petition shall accordingly stand dismissed.
___________________________
B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.
GS
__________________
C.V. RAMULU, J.
To
1 The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Unit - 1 (II), 4th Floor, Annex Building, Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
3 The Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise, Prohibition and Excise Building, 5th floor, M.J.Road, Hyderabad.
4 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Ranga Reddy District.
5 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Hyderabad District.
6. Two CCs to the G.P. for Prohibition and Excise, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
7. Two C.D. Copies.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.