Case LawHigh Court › Wp/656/2022 Of Prakash Chain Khubchandan...

Wp/656/2022 Of Prakash Chain Khubchandani v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 6(1)(2) And 3 Ors

High Court 28 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/656/2022 Of Prakash Chain Khubchandani v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 6(1)(2) And 3 Ors
Date of order
28 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/656/2022 Of Prakash Chain Khubchandani v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 6(1)(2) And 3 Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY2022.03.0514:43:46+0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 656 OF 2022 Prakash Chain Khubchandani….Petitioner V/s.Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 6(1)(2), Mumbai & Ors.…Respondents ---- Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 3[rd] MARCH, 2022 P.C. : 1.We have heard counsel. Mr. Mistri states that the objections tore-opening has been filed by a letter dated 10[th] January, 2022 and 12[th]January, 2022 and the same is yet to be disposed. Therefore, theJurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is directed to consider petitioner’sobjections and dispose the same within three weeks from today. Beforedisposing the objections JAO shall give a personal hearing to petitioner andnotice of personal hearing shall be given atleast seven days in advance. Ifthe concerned authority is going to rely on any judgment or any order of theTribunal or Court, a list thereof shall be provided to petitioner alongwith thenotice for personal hearing so that petitioner will be able to deal with thesame/distinguish the same during the personal hearing.Any order passedshall be a reasoned and detailed order dealing with all the submissions ofpetitioner. 2.The assessment proceedings otherwise are stayed until thisorder on objections is passed and for period of four weeks thereafter. All rights and contentions are kept open. 3.We clarify that we have not made any observations on themerits of the case. 4.Petition disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan