Case LawHigh Court › Wp/682/2018 Of Swastik Reality Pvt. Ltd...

Wp/682/2018 Of Swastik Reality Pvt. Ltd v. Union Of India And Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (2) (2)

High Court 03 May 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/682/2018 Of Swastik Reality Pvt. Ltd v. Union Of India And Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (2) (2)
Date of order
03 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/682/2018 Of Swastik Reality Pvt. Ltd v. Union Of India And Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 11 (2) (2), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/2 * WP-682-2018 3.5.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 682 OF 2018 Swastik Reality Pvt. Ltd.….PetitionerV/s.Union of India and anr.….Respondents * * * * * Mr. Sunil Patel i/by. Sunil & Co., Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-3RD MAY, 2018. P.C. :- 1. This petition challenges the re-opening notice dated 31st March, 2017 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to re-open the assessment for the Assessment Year 2010-11. Mr. Sunil Patel appearing in support of the petition states that pending the disposal of this petition the Assessing Officer has passed an assessment order on 28th December, 2017 under Section 143(3) read with 147 of the Act. The petitioner has already preferred an Appeal from the above order dated 28[th] December, 2017 to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to urge the contentions raised herein before the Appellate Authority under the Act. Liberty as prayed for granted. 3.The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan