Wp/68657/2010 Of Vinay Nanadalal Kothari v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/68657/2010 Of Vinay Nanadalal Kothari v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/68657/2010 Of Vinay Nanadalal Kothari v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKACIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
Between
W.P. No. 68697/2010 (T-IT)
Vinay Nanadalal Kothari,Age: 32 years, Occ.: business,R/o Camp, Belgaum, representedby his GPA Holder Arunkumar M. Runawal @ Kothari,Age: 94 years, Occ.: business,R/o Station Road, Bijapur.
_..Petitioner'|
(By Sri. Shriharsh A. Neelopant, Advocate)
And:
1.The Additional Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Bijapur Range,Behind Godavari Hotel,ohastri Nagar, Byapur-586 104,Income Tax, Bijapur Range,Behind Godavari Hotel,ohastri Nagar, Byapur-586 104,
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Byapur Range, Camp Income TaxOfficer, Opp. Civil Hospital, Belgaum.Byapur Range, Camp Income TaxOfficer, Opp. Civil Hospital, Belgaum.
3.The Union of India represented byIncome Tax Officer, Ward No. I,Near All India Radio, Athani Road,Byapur-5386 104,Income Tax Officer, Ward No. I,Near All India Radio, Athani Road,Byapur-5386 104,
4 I.A.C. Acquisition Range-C.R. BuildingInfantry Road, Bangalore-560 OO1Represented by Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.Infantry Road, Bangalore-560 OO1Represented by Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.
5.Central Board of Direct Taxes,Income Tax Department,Mayor Bhavan, New Delhi-110 O01Rep. by its Chairman.Income Tax Department,Mayor Bhavan, New Delhi-110 O01Rep. by its Chairman.
6.Inspecting Assistant CommissionerIncome Tax, Acquisition Range,Dharwad-580 O04,Income Tax, Acquisition Range,Dharwad-580 O04,
... Respondents
(By Sri. Y.V. Raviraj, Advocate for R1 to R6)
This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India praying to direct the respondents todrop the acquisition proceedings initiated by virtue of theorder dated 23.03.1976 in respect of the property bearingCTS No.1750/1B, and etc.
This petition coming on for preliminary hearing BGroup this day, the Courtmade the following:
ORDER
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for the petitionerseeksleaveTOwithdrawthisWrit|petitionunconditionally. Leave granted. The writ petition isaccordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed.
*99
SD/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue