Case Law › High Court › Wp/687/2006 Of Dadasaheb Narayanrao Manm...

Wp/687/2006 Of Dadasaheb Narayanrao Manmadkar v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4), And Anr

High Court 22 Feb 2006 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

22 Feb 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/687/2006 Of Dadasaheb Narayanrao Manmadkar v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(4), And Anr, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with the above liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.687 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.687 OF 2006 Dadasaheb Narayanrao Manmadkar ..Petitioner. V/s. The Income-tax Officer & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardan for petitioner. Mr.S.R.Chavan with Arun Nagarjun for respondents. CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006. CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file three separate petitions challenging three different orders pertaining to three different assessment years. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with the above liberty. (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.