Case LawHigh Court › Wp/6959/2014 Of A.jagan Mohan Reddy v. T...

Wp/6959/2014 Of A.jagan Mohan Reddy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Appeals)-Iv

High Court 11 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/6959/2014 Of A.jagan Mohan Reddy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Appeals)-Iv
Date of order
11 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/6959/2014 Of A.jagan Mohan Reddy v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Appeals)-Iv, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above, we find no merits in this writ petition andthe same is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.6959 of2014 ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ashutosh Mohunta) This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, to declare the action of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in takingcoercive steps for recovery of the revised amount assessed forpayment of the tax for the Assessment Year 2009-2010 together with interest during the pendency of the appealbefore the 1[st] respondent as illegal and arbitrary. In the present case, there was a reassessment for the year2009-2010 and vide order in proceedings No.67/CIT-III/STAY/2012-13 dated 19.12.2012 passed by theCommissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad, the petitioner wasdirected to pay 50% of the demand on or before 25.03.2013 in equalinstallments w.e.f., 26.12.2012 The petitioner has not complied with the direction issued by theCommissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad. We find that the directionissued by the Commissioner is very reasonable as the petitioner hasbeen directed to pay 50% of the demand. In view of the above, we find no merits in this writ petition andthe same is dismissed. However, keeping in view the fact that thepetitioner has been prosecuting the matter before the HigherAuthorities, we grant time to him till 12.05.2014, to comply with theorder dated 19.12.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, in this Writ Petition shallstand dismissed. __________________________________ JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. _________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY. Date : 11-03-2014pab
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan