Case LawHigh Court › Wp/7016/2024 Of Ibm India Private Limite...

Wp/7016/2024 Of Ibm India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/7016/2024 Of Ibm India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/7016/2024 Of Ibm India Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitally signedby VINUTHA Bby VINUTHA B SLocation: HighCourt ofKarnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION No. 7016 OF 2024 (TIT) BETWEEN: 1. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFIC AT A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFIC AT No.12, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 029, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 029, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR SHANKAR RAMJEE, AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR SHANKAR RAMJEE, RESIDING AT SJR LUXURIA, FLAT B2,-012, SAPPHIRE FLAT B2,-012, SAPPHIRE BLOCK 456, AREKERE, MICO LAYOUT, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560076. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 1(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 1(2), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560095. 3. CENTRALIZED PROECESSING CENTER, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC BENGALURU - 560 500. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC BENGALURU - 560 500. 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX(SYSTEMS), ARA CENTRE, GROUND FLOOR, E-2, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION, ARA CENTRE, GROUND FLOOR, E-2, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION, NEW DELHI - 110055. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DILIP M., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH REFUND AN AMOUNT OF Rs.154,08,41,927/- BEING DETERMINED AS DUE TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE ORDERS DATED 18.02.2022 AND 13.04.2023 PASSED BY R-1 GIVING EFFECT TO THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE TRIBUNAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2008-09 TO 2015-16 (ANNEXURES A1 - A8) A/W APPLICABLE INTEREST (ON THE AMOUNT OF Rs.154,08,41,927/-) UNTIL THE DATE OF GRANT OF THE REFUND. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R In this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following relief: "i) Directing the respondents to forthwith refund an amount of Rs.154,08,41,927/- being determined as due to the petitioner under the orders dated 18.02.2022 and 13.04.2023 passed by R-1 giving effect to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Hon'ble Court and the Tribunal for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2015-16 an amount of Rs.154,08,41,927/- being determined as due to the petitioner under the orders dated 18.02.2022 and 13.04.2023 passed by R-1 giving effect to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Hon'ble Court and the Tribunal for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2015-16 (Annexures A1 - A8) a/w applicable interest (on the amount of Rs.154,08,41,927/-) until the date of grant of the refund. ii) Directing the Respondents to forthwith refund an amount of Rs.59,70,096/-, being the interest short granted for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 a/w applicable interest; and an amount of Rs.59,70,096/-, being the interest short granted for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 a/w applicable interest; and iii) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. " Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. " 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the materials on record. ii) Directing the Respondents to forthwith refund an amount of Rs.59,70,096/-, being the interest short granted for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 a/w applicable interest; and an amount of Rs.59,70,096/-, being the interest short granted for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 a/w applicable interest; and iii) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. " Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. " 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the materials on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the orders at Annexure - A1 to A8 in order to contend that despite the said orders and the petitioner filing application in Form - 26B of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as 'IT Act' for short) at Annexures - B1 to B8, the respondents have only refunded the principal component and not the determined interest payable of Rs.154,08,41,927/- as well as shortfall of Rs.59,70,096/- which deserves to be refunded back to the petitioner together with further applicable interest on the petitioner and since the same has not been done by the respondents, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. 4. Per contra, leaned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondents would take necessary steps to refund the aforesaid amount of Rs.154,08,41,927/- and Rs.59,70,096/- after verification together with applicable interest to the petitioner within a stipulated time frame. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the undisputed material on record comprising of Annexures - A1 to A8 and B1 to B8 and the representation dated 03.01.2024 submitted by the petitioner, which has not been complied with by the respondents so far, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of the petition directing the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.154,08,41,927/- together with applicable interest back to the petitioner under Section 244A of the IT Act on or before 30.04.2024. In addition thereto, the respondents are also directed to refund Rs.59,70,096/- being the alleged short fall of the interest granted for the Assessment Year 2013-14 and 2015-16 together with applicable interest under Section 244A of the IT Act back to the petitioner after due verification on or before 30.04.2024. Subject to the aforesaid direction, petition stands disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan