Wp/7456/2013 Of Sri Srinivasa Vidhya Parishad v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Jun 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/7456/2013 Of Sri Srinivasa Vidhya Parishad v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/7456/2013 Of Sri Srinivasa Vidhya Parishad v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.7456 of 2013
DATE: 26.06.2013
Between:
Sri Srinivasa Vidhya Parishad,Visakhapatnam.
… Petitioner
And
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,Visakhapatnam & another.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.7456 of 2013
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner hasalready deposited the tax component and now the department is demandingfor payment of interest component. Therefore, he wants to bring the disputein relation to payment of interest in this writ petition. We are of the view thatthis cannot be granted.
The writ petition has now become infructuous, as the deposit hasalready made on account of tax and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition in relationto payment of interest. No costs.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________
G. ROHINI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue