Wp/747/2022 Of Regency Nirman Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors
High Court
28 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/747/2022 Of Regency Nirman Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors
Date of order
28 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/747/2022 Of Regency Nirman Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned by1/1MEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY2022.03.2916:07:35CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION+0530WRIT PETITION NO.747 OF 2022
Regency Nirman Ltd.….Petitioner
V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & ors. ----
…Respondents
Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Fenil Bhatt i/b Mr. Atul K Jasani
for PetitionerMr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
N.R. BORKAR, JJ
DATED : 28[th] MARCH 2022
P.C. :
1Mr. Suresh Kumar agrees with Mr. Mistri that the findings of this court
in Writ Petition No.264 of 2022 passed on 8[th] March 2022 shall apply to this
case as well and therefore, petition can be allowed in terms of prayer clause
(a).
2Accordingly petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a),
which reads as under:
(a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari orany other writ order or direction under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India calling for the records of the case leading to theissue of the impugned notice and passing of the impugned order andafter going through the same and examining the question of legalitythereof quash, cancel and set aside the impugned notice (Exhibit P)dated March 18, 2021 and impugned order (Exhibit W) datedSeptember 3, 2021.
3Petition disposed.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.