Wp/7489/2003 Of M/S.shraddha Associates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune And Ors
High Court
08 Aug 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/7489/2003 Of M/S.shraddha Associates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune And Ors
Date of order
08 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/7489/2003 Of M/S.shraddha Associates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Pune And Ors, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Petition stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7489 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7489 OF 2003
M/s. Shraddha Associates ...Petitioners
V/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II ...Respondents.
& Ors.
Mr.Atul Jasani for the Petitioners.
Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 8th August, 2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. We have perused the Application dated 21st
July, 2005 filed by the learned Advocate for the
Petitioner and also a copy of the letter dated 7.7.05
addressed to the Petitioner which has been duly served
on the Petitioner as indicated in the acknowledgment
A.D.Form. For the reasons stated in the Application,
the learned counsel for the Petitioner stands
discharged from the above matter and nobody is
appearing for the Petitioner. The Petition stands
dismissed in default.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue