Case LawHigh Court › Wp/756/2023 Of Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soa...

Wp/756/2023 Of Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors

High Court 04 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Wp/756/2023 Of Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors
Date of order
04 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/756/2023 Of Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Niti IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.756 OF 2023 Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares Aged about 54 years Residing at No.432, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa, PIN : 403502 ... Petitioner Versus1. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Assessment Circle – 2(1), BMTC Building, 80 Feet Road, 6[th] Block, Near KHB Games Village Koraamangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, Pin Code: 560095. 2. The Dispute Resolution Panel-I, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka. 3. Union of India, Through the Finance Secretary, Having office at New Delhi. … Respondents Mr Hanumant D. Naik, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ. DATE: 4[th] MARCH 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per M.S. Sonak, J.) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ₹₹ 1 (2011) 198 Taxman 6 (Gujarat) 2 (2016) 240 Tazman 707 (Delhi) 6. ₹₹₹ 7. 8.₹ 9.₹₹ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Assessing Officer, Income Tax Department 26. 27. 28. VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. NITI KISHOR Digitally signed by NITI KISHOR HALDANKAR HALDANKARDate: 2024.04.05 15:42:15 +05'30' M. S. SONAK, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan