Case LawHigh Court › Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chi...

Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1

High Court 11 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1
Date of order
11 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn with a liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner inaccordance with law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 7692 of 2008 Between: K.Balakrishna, S/o. K.Dattatri, R/o. H.No.1-3-1/5, 201 GK'S Srinikethan Near Petrol Bunk Lan Kavadiguda, Hyderabad 500 008 AND \..... PETITIONER 1 The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Govt of India, Income tax Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Income Tax(Inv) 9th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3 The Director General of Income Tax(Investigations) O/o. Director General of Income Tax (inv), 9th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to declare the proceedings of Respondent No.3namely the Director of Income Tax(Investigations) Hyderabad inF.No. Pluspoint/DIT(Inv)/*2006-07 dated 8-5-2006 as illegal, arbitrary,unjust and contrary to his proceedings dated 18-8-2005 in F.No. PlusPoint/DIT(iNV)/2005-06 and consequentially direct the respondentNo.3, to release the amount as mentioned in proceedings dated 18-8-2005 and pass necessary order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.S.N.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.J.V.PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX) The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER:(per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court towithdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies open tohim under law. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn with a liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner inaccordance with law. No order as to costs. ____________________ August 11, 2008MAS To 1.2CCs to2.2CD copiesForm-NIC-OGS/WP{LS} Justice T.Meena Kumari ______________________Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan