Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1
High Court
11 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1
Date of order
11 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/7692/2008 Of K.balakrishna v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn with a liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner inaccordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO : 7692 of 2008
Between:
K.Balakrishna, S/o. K.Dattatri,
R/o. H.No.1-3-1/5, 201 GK'S Srinikethan
Near Petrol Bunk Lan Kavadiguda, Hyderabad 500 008
AND
\..... PETITIONER
1 The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-1,
Govt of India, Income tax Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad.
2 The Director General of Income Tax(Inv) 9th Floor,
Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
3 The Director General of Income Tax(Investigations)
O/o. Director General of Income Tax (inv),
9th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to declare the proceedings of Respondent No.3namely the Director of Income Tax(Investigations) Hyderabad inF.No. Pluspoint/DIT(Inv)/*2006-07 dated 8-5-2006 as illegal, arbitrary,unjust and contrary to his proceedings dated 18-8-2005 in F.No. PlusPoint/DIT(iNV)/2005-06 and consequentially direct the respondentNo.3, to release the amount as mentioned in proceedings dated 18-8-2005 and pass necessary order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.S.N.PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent No.:
MR.J.V.PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:(per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court towithdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail the remedies open tohim under law.
Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn with a liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner inaccordance with law. No order as to costs.
____________________
August 11, 2008MAS
To
1.2CCs to2.2CD copiesForm-NIC-OGS/WP{LS}
Justice T.Meena Kumari
______________________Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar..... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.