Wp/7748/2023 Of Sri. Basavaraju Muninarayana v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
21 Apr 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/7748/2023 Of Sri. Basavaraju Muninarayana v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
2019-20, 2018-19
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/7748/2023 Of Sri. Basavaraju Muninarayana v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byNARASIMHAMURTHYVANAMALALocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF APRIL,2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7748 OF 2023(T-IT)
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO.7750 OF 2023(T-IT)
BETWEEN:
SRI. BASAVARAJU MUNINARAYANA
S/O BASAVARAJU, AGED 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO.10, LAKSHMI NILAYA, MUNESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD, NAGASHETTIHALLI, BANGALORE-560094.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND V CHAVAN.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-6(2) (4) BMTC BUILDING, 60 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. WARD-6(2) (4) BMTC BUILDING, 60 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4),
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 4. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
(BY SRI.E.I. SANMATHI., ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FURNISH THE SATISFACTION NOTE PREPARED IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE TRANSFERRING ASSESSING OFFICER RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT WHICH IS MANDOTORY U/S. 153C OF THE IT ACT FOR A.Y. 2019-20; QUASH THE ATTACHMENT ORDER PASSED U/S. 226 OF THE IT ACT DATED 04.11.2022 BEARING NO.ITBA/COM/F/ 17/2022-23/1046907033(1) ANNEXURE-F1 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20; QUASH THE PENALTY ORDER PASSED U/S. 270A OF THE IT ACT DATED 28.02.2022 BEARING NO ITBA/PNL/ F/270A/2021-22/ 1040164451991) ANNEXURE-D2 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20.
IN WP NO.7750/2023
BETWEEN:
SRI. BASAVARAJU MUNINARAYANA S/O. BASAVARAJU AGED 38 YEARS, R/AT. NO.10, LAKSHMI NILAYA, MUNESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD,
NAGASHETTIHALLI, BANGALORE-560094.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND V CHAVAN.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-6(2)(4), BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. WARD-6(2)(4), BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. INCOME TAX-6, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
4. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.E.I. SANMATHI., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FURNISH THE SATISFACTION NOTE PREPARED IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE TRANSFERRING ASSESSING OFFICER RESPONDENT NO.1 TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT WHICH IS MANDATORY U/S. 153C OF THE IT ACT FOR A.Y. 2018-19; QUASH THE
ATTACHMENT ORDER PASSED U/S. 226 OF THE IT ACT DATED 04.11.2022 BEARING NO.ITBA/ COM/ F/17/2022-23/1046907033(1) ANNEXURE-F1 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19; QUASH THE PENALTY ORDER PASSED U/S. 270A OF THE IT ACT DATED 28.02.2022 BEARING NO ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2021-22/104016420(1) ANNEXURE-E2 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
ATTACHMENT ORDER PASSED U/S. 226 OF THE IT ACT DATED 04.11.2022 BEARING NO.ITBA/ COM/ F/17/2022-23/1046907033(1) ANNEXURE-F1 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19; QUASH THE PENALTY ORDER PASSED U/S. 270A OF THE IT ACT DATED 28.02.2022 BEARING NO ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2021-22/104016420(1) ANNEXURE-E2 PASSED BY THIRD RESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved by the third respondent's assessment orders dated 05.07.2021 for the assessment years viz., 2019-20 and 2018-19 respectively and the attachment orders issued under Section 226 the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is submitted that in similar circumstances that are canvassed as in these petitions, this Court has interfered with the assessment orders restoring the proceedings to the third respondent for reconsideration with liberty to the petitioner to file detailed submissions. In support of this submission, a copy of this Court's order dated
16.03.2023 in W.P.No.4943/2017 c/w.
W.P.No.4847/2023 is placed on record.
On perusal of the records, the petitions are allowed quashing the impugned assessment orders dated 05.07.2021 and the attachment order dated 04.11.2022 [Annexures -A and F1 respectively in these writ petitions] restoring the proceedings for reconsideration by the third respondent. The petitioner shall appear before the third respondent without further notice on 03.05.2023. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file detailed submissions.
Sd/- JUDGE
SA ct:sr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.