In Wp/7878/2021 Of Rahul Sethi v. Income Tax Office, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Petition is dismissed having rendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANSOUMYA RANJANDALAIDate: 2021.09.2917:39:08 IST
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshWP-7878-2021
(RAHUL SETHIVs INCOME TAX OFFICE AND OTHERS)
Indore, Dated :[29][-][09][-][2021]
Shri PM Choudhary, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Kamal Tiwari,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that in view ofan order of reassessment dated 23/09/2021 passed by Competent Authority,
this petition has rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
Petition is dismissed having rendered infructuous.
(SUJOY PAUL)(ANIL VERMA)JUDGEJUDGE soumya
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue