Case LawHigh Court › Wp/7890/2014 Of Smt. Puttamma v. The Chi...

Wp/7890/2014 Of Smt. Puttamma v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/7890/2014 Of Smt. Puttamma v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/7890/2014 Of Smt. Puttamma v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF APRIL, 2014 | BEFOR E) THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA| %WRIT PETITION NO.7890/2014 (SRES) BETWEEN' SMT. PUTTAMMAW/O. LATE GURUMALLESHAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.R/AT NO.33, 4 MAIN, 4 CROSSAGRAHARA DASARAHALLIMAGADI ROAD,BANGALORE.WORKING AS CLASS IV EMPLOYEEIN THE DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX,OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF.INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGC.R. ROAD, BANGALORE.PETITIONER (BY SRI M. PRADEEP, ADV.) AND" 1.|THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, QUEENS ROADA WING, 4 FLOOR, C R BUILDING,|BANGALORE-560 OO1.. 2 |THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, UNITY BUILDINGJ.C. ROAD, |BANGALORE-560 OO2. 3THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXGOVERNMENT OF INDIA, UNITY BUILDING| J.C. ROAD, | RESPONDENTS BANGALORE-560 OO2.. THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 2) 7OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT|OF MANDAMUS TO CONSIDER HER REGULARISATION OF|SERVICE, ACCORD PERMANENT STATUS IN VIEW OF HER.EXPERIENCE AND HER HUSBAND'S PAST SERVICE TOTALLING|UPTO 16 YEARS OF UNPRECEDENTED SERVICE TO THE|RESPONDENT - DEPARTMENT.. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING|THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Tne lis pertains to recruitment in tne Income Tax Department. Hence, this writ petition is not maintainable. | Tne petitioner may approach tne Central Administrative|Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals|Act and seek relief. All contentions raised in this writ petition are left| open for being urged and considered by the Central. Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Region. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/-. JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan