Wp/8186/2019 Of M/S. Tns India Private Limited v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2
High Court
25 Sep 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/8186/2019 Of M/S. Tns India Private Limited v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2
Date of order
25 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/8186/2019 Of M/S. Tns India Private Limited v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In vicrv o[ the [:rbovc, ][the ][Writ ][Petition stands dismissed ][as]inlructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
I\,4ONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE [P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
WRIT PETITION NO: 8186 OF 2019
Between:
M/s. TNS lndia Private Limited, [Having its ][office ][at ][7th ][Floor, ][Orion Block, ][The]V-Ascendas lT Park, Plot [No.17, ][Software ][Units Layout, ][Madhapur,]Hyderabad -500 081 Represented [by ][its ][authorized signatory ][IMr. ][Satbaba]Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
1The Asst. Commissioner of lncome [Tax-2, ][Circle- 2(2), ][Hyderabad, ][Room ][No]513, 5th Floor, Signature Towers, [Kothaguda]513, 5th Floor, Signature Towers, [Kothaguda]
2The Principal Commissioner of lncome [Tax -2, ][6th ][Floor, ][Signature ][Towers,]Kothaguda Junction, Kondapur, [Hyderabad - ][500 ][084.]Kothaguda Junction, Kondapur, [Hyderabad - ][500 ][084.]
3. Union of lndia, rep. by [its ]Secretary, [Ministry ][of ][Finance, ][South Block, ][New]DelhiDelhi
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the [Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit [filed ][therewith, ][the High ][Court ][may ][be]pleased to the issue of the lmpugned Consequential Order [under section ][143(3)]read with section 263 of the Act [for ]A.Y. [2011- 12 ][dated ][December ][31,]2018(Exhibit l), the lmpugned Demand [Notice ][(Exhibit ][J) ][and the ][lmpugned]Penalty Notice (Exhibit K) and, after [going ][through and examining ][the ][question ][of]the validity, [propriety ]and legality [thereof, ][be ][pleased ][to ][declare ][the ][same ][to ][be]illegal and unenforceable, and, [quash ]the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 201g
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances ][stated]in the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ][the High ][Court may be pleased ][to]pending the hearing and final disposal of this Petition, stay [the ][operation of ][the]impugned consequential order dated [December ][31 ], [2018 ][(Exhibit ][l)' ][the]
impugned Demand Notice 31 , 2018 (Exhibit J) and impugned Penalty noticedated December, 31 2O18 (Exhibit K)
lA NO: ['f ]OF 2022
Petition uhder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased toadvance the hearing of the above Wnt Petition no. 8186 of 2019 kom 1911212022to any date preferably in the Month of November, 2022.to any date preferably in the Month of November, 2022.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G. NARENDRA CHETW
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: M/s. K. MAMATA
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR,
DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE [P.SAM KOSHY]
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI
w.P. No.8186 of2Ol9
ORDER:6,r'r [ltorr'lrl.' ][.srr ][,/r/.stt( ][c ][P-SAM K0S.HY)]
Whcn thc matter is [taken up ][for ][hearing, learned counsel ][for][he petitioncr submits [that in the light of the ][subsequent]developmcL,rts [that ][have ][been ][transpired, nothing ][further ][remains ][to]be adjudicated [upon ][in ][the ][present ]"vrit [petition']
2. In vicrv o[ the [:rbovc, ][the ][Writ ][Petition stands dismissed ][as]inlructuous. No [order ][as ][to ][costs.]
Consequentlr', [misccllaneous ][petitions pcnding' ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed.
SD/. T. TIRUMALA ASSISTANI.REGlSTRARC)hSECTIdN OFFICER
//rRUE coPY//
To,'"'1. On" CC to SRI G. NARENDRA CHETTY, Advo-cate i. il; cc io ult. [K. ][MAMATA, ][Advocate ]LO?qql -5. o;; cc i; sRt [cAor ][i;'nnvrei'r ][iuutnh' ] [sollclroR ] oF INDIA [oPUC]4. Two CD CoPiesBNGJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510912023
ORDER
WP.No.8186 of 2019
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
2. In vicrv o[ the [:rbovc, ][the ][Writ ][Petition stands dismissed ][as]inlructuous. No [order ][as ][to ][costs.]
Consequentlr', [misccllaneous ][petitions pcnding' ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed.
SD/. T. TIRUMALA ASSISTANI.REGlSTRARC)hSECTIdN OFFICER
//rRUE coPY//
To,'"'1. On" CC to SRI G. NARENDRA CHETTY, Advo-cate i. il; cc io ult. [K. ][MAMATA, ][Advocate ]LO?qql -5. o;; cc i; sRt [cAor ][i;'nnvrei'r ][iuutnh' ] [sollclroR ] oF INDIA [oPUC]4. Two CD CoPiesBNGJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2510912023
ORDER
WP.No.8186 of 2019
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
lr\[r\rt]
1tr[s ][sr4] .+ot<(cc\lq 0[T [ztfi].c, ItIr r),,7
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.