Wp/822/2021 Of Kajal Niraj Gupta v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai
High Court
20 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/822/2021 Of Kajal Niraj Gupta v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai
Date of order
20 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/822/2021 Of Kajal Niraj Gupta v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
mp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 821 OF 2021
Kajal Niraj Gupta
... Petitioner
V/s.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai 27
… Respondent
WITHWRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2021
Niraj Chandulal Gupta
... Petitioner
V/s.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai 27
… Respondent
WITHWRIT PETITION NO. 822 OF 2021
Kajal Niraj Gupta
... Petitioner
V/s.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai 27… Respondent
Ms. Ritika Agarwal and Mr. Salman Balbale i/b. ACE Legal, for
Petitioners.Mr. Nirmal Chandra Mohanty, for Respondent.
CORAM:SUNIL P. DESHMUKH &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE
: APRIL 20, 2021
( THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING )
P. C.
.Learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeksleave to withdraw the Petitions. Learned counsel for theRespondent has no particular objection. Leave granted. The WritPetitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
( ABHAY AHUJA, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue