Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8229/2022 Of M/S.omega Pilling Rigs v...

Wp/8229/2022 Of M/S.omega Pilling Rigs v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 05 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/8229/2022 Of M/S.omega Pilling Rigs v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/8229/2022 Of M/S.omega Pilling Rigs v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the assessment orders, subsequently been passed in the manner known to law. petition is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.04.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.8229 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.8231 & 8233 of 2022 M/s.Omega Piling Rigs,No.40A, CHB Colony West,Tiruchengode TK, Namakkal-637 202. …. Petitioner 1.Income Tax Officer,National Faceless Assessment Centre,National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (Income Tax Department) 2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Tiruchengode-637211. …. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2[nd] respondent dated 29.03.2021 in DIN:ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031867423(1)relatingtothe assessment order passed under Sec.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014-15 in PAN: and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vasudevan For Respondents : Mr.A.N.R.Jayapratap, Junior Standing Counsel Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the assessment orders, subsequently been passed in the manner known to law. petition is also dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the assessment orders, subsequently been passed in the manner known to law. SD/-ASSISTANT REGISTRARASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // Anu/Kst SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Income Tax Officer,National Faceless Assessment Centre,Delhi (Income Tax Department)National Faceless Assessment Centre,Delhi (Income Tax Department)2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Tiruchengode-637211.Ward-1, Tiruchengode-637211.+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate Sr.23447 W.P.No.8229 of 2022 kk[co]srg 18/04/2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan