Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8248/2005 Of Weikfield Products Co. (...

Wp/8248/2005 Of Weikfield Products Co. (I) Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 24 Jan 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/8248/2005 Of Weikfield Products Co. (I) Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
24 Jan 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/8248/2005 Of Weikfield Products Co. (I) Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.8247 OF 2005AND WRIT PETITION NO.8248 OF 2005 WRIT PETITON NO.8247 OF 2005 AND WRIT PETITION NO.8248 OF 2005 Weikfield Products Co.(I) Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.S.N.Inamdar for petitioner. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for respondents. CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2006. DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. After the filing of the present petition challenging the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue has completed the assessment and passed the assessment order dated 18th November, 2005. Aggrieved by the said assessment, the petitioner has already filed appeals against the same. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these petitions. Hence both the petitions stand dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan