Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8278/2012 Of National Thermal Power C...

Wp/8278/2012 Of National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 29 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/8278/2012 Of National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
29 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/8278/2012 Of National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA W.P. No.8278 of 2012 --DATED: 29032012 Between: National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.,Visakhaptnam. And … Petitioner The Income Tax Officer and another. … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA Writ Petition No.8278 of 2012 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that a demand has beenraised by the Revenue for the assessment years 2007-2008, 2008-2009and 2009-10. It is stated that appeals are pending before the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment years 2007-2008and 2009-10 and in respect of assessment year 2008-2009, an appeal ispending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 2. It is stated that the petitioner was desirous of moving anapplication for stay before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. But sincea Bench was not available, no such application could be moved. 3. It is stated that now a Bench has been constituted atVisakhapatnam for the week commencing from 9.4.2012. The petitionerwill be moving an application for stay before the Tribunal on or before2.4.2012. It is stated that efforts will be made to have the applicationlisted before the Tribunal on 9.4.2012. 4. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitionerdoes not press this writ petition, but seeks liberty to move the Tribunalwith a stay application. 5. We accordingly dispose of this writ petition as not pressed,but make it clear that the respondents will not take any coercive stepsuntil the stay application is taken up by the Tribunal in the weekcommencing from 9.4.2012. 6. The miscellaneous application is also disposed of. MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ 29-03-2012pnb B.N. RAO NALLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan