Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8326/2021 Of M/S. Davanam Constructio...

Wp/8326/2021 Of M/S. Davanam Construction Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Jun 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/8326/2021 Of M/S. Davanam Construction Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/8326/2021 Of M/S. Davanam Construction Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF JUNE, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION No.8326/2021 (TIT) Between: M/s. Davanam Construction Private Limited No.148, Surveyor Street, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru - 560 004 Represented by its Director Shri Harish D V Aged about 58 years. … Petitioner (By Sri K. Shashi Kiran Shetty, Senior Counsel a/w Sri A. Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate) And: Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 1(4), CR Building Queens road Bangalore - 560 001. … Respondent (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the strike down the impugned demand dated 31.12.2019 vide Annexure-L connected with time barred assessment order dated 31.12.2019 vide Annexure-J arising out of illegal, ultra-virus notice under Section 153C of Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21.08.2019 vide Annexure-B for A.Y.2012-2013 as being void, illegal beyond authority and hence unconstitutional and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court, made the following: ORDER Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal and seeks permission to withdraw the petition. In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the rejection of interim order as per law. All contentions of the petitioner are kept open. Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan