Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8349/2005 Of Sushilaben G.gundesha v....

Wp/8349/2005 Of Sushilaben G.gundesha v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors

High Court 11 Sep 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/8349/2005 Of Sushilaben G.gundesha v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors
Date of order
11 Sep 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/8349/2005 Of Sushilaben G.gundesha v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8349 OF 2005 Sushilaben G. Gundesha .. Petitioner. V/s. The Commissioner of Income-tax and others .. Respondents. Mr.M.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.A.M. Kotangale for the respondents. CORAM :H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kulkarni in support of this petition. Mr.Kotangale appears for the respondents. 2. The petition has two prayers. The first prayer is to challenge the decision under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. That decision was rendered way back on 23rd February, 1999. The second prayer is to challenge the assessment of the petitioner made on 15th February, 1998. As far as that assessment is concerned, the petitioner carried matter upto the Tribunal and the Tribunal has confirmed the assessment on 14th February, 2005. 3. As far as the KVSS decision is concerned, the 2 petitioner has filed miscellaneous application. Mr.Kulkarni states that the petitioner will pursue that remedy. As far as the assessment is concerned, he makes a further statement that the petitioner, if so advised, may file an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. He, therefore, seeks to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan