Case Law › High Court › Wp/836/2023 Of Infrastructure Leasing An...

Wp/836/2023 Of Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Services Ltd v. Union Of India, Income Tax Dpet

High Court 19 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Jan 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/836/2023 Of Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Services Ltd v. Union Of India, Income Tax Dpet, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTIPRASADORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARABDigitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2024.01.1916:55:17 +0530WRIT PETITION NO. 832 OF 2023 IL & FS Financial Services Limited V/s. Union of India, Income Tax Department (Through The Commissioner of IncomeTax – Circle 14(1)(1)) ….Petitioner …Respondent ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 836 OF 2023 Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Services Limited ….Petitioner V/s. Union of India, Income Tax Department (Through The Commissioner of IncomeTax – Circle 14(1)(1)) …Respondent ---- Mr. Harsh Kapadia a/w Ms. Dishti Das and Ms. Roma Bhojani i/b CyrilAmarchand Mangaldas for Petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondent-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATED : 19[th] JANUARY 2024 DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. P.C. : 1. Mr. Kapadia states that there are certain facts which were inadvertently missed out when the petition was filed and since that would require extensive amendment, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petition. 2.Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.