Wp/849/2015 Of Slum Rehabilitation Authority v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Ememp)-1(2) And 2 Ors
High Court
11 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/849/2015 Of Slum Rehabilitation Authority v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Ememp)-1(2) And 2 Ors
Date of order
11 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/849/2015 Of Slum Rehabilitation Authority v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Ememp)-1(2) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 849 OF 2015
Slum Rehabilitation Authority
V/s.
The Deputy Director of Income Tax(Exemption – I(2), Mumbai And Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani and Mr. Rishabh Jain i/b UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 11[th] MARCH, 2022
P.C. :
1.Mr. Suresh Kumar tenders affidavit in reply of one Mr. AswiniPrasad, JCIT (OSD), Mumbai affirmed on 9[th] March, 2022 which is taken onrecord.
2.Counsel state that findings of this court in Writ Petition No.861
of 2015 dated 11[th] March, 2022 will squarely apply to this petition also.Therefore, this petition also is allowed in terms of prayer clause – (a) which
reads as under :
(a)that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ ofCertiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any otherappropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 and/orArticle 227 of the Constitution of India calling for the recordsof the Petitioner’s case and after examining the legality andvalidity thereof quash and set aside the impugned Noticedated 29 March 2014 issued by Respondent No.1 undersection 148 of the Act (Exhibit A), the Impugned Order dated
16 February 2015 (Exhibit B) issued by Respondent No.2 andthe Impugned Notices.
3.Petition disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue