Case Law › High Court › Wp/8649/2011 Of Capt.salim Sheikh And 4...

Wp/8649/2011 Of Capt.salim Sheikh And 4 Ors v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I And 3 Ors

High Court 29 Nov 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_ind

Parties

Date of order

29 Nov 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/8649/2011 Of Capt.salim Sheikh And 4 Ors v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I And 3 Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Writ Petition No.8649 of 2011 29.11.2012 Shri Sumit Nema, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri R.L.Jain, learned Senior counsel with Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the respondents. In this petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.09.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed under Section 127 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Indore transferring the petitioners' cases from I.T.O. 3 (1), Indore to ACIT, Central Circle 24 & 26 in the charge of CIT, Central-II, Mumbai. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed on record an order dated 17.08.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Indore transferring the petitioners' cases from ITO-3 (1), Indore to ACIT-3 (1), Indore. According to the petitioners, in view of the subsequent event of passing of the order dated 17.08.2012 this petition challenging the order dated 26.09.2012 has rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. (Shantanu Kemkar) AM Judge (Prakash Shrivastava) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.