Wp/8697/2006 Of Vasant Vishvanath Mandke v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Iii And Ors
High Court
26 Feb 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/8697/2006 Of Vasant Vishvanath Mandke v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Iii And Ors
Date of order
26 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/8697/2006 Of Vasant Vishvanath Mandke v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Iii And Ors, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with liberty as aforesaid.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8697 of 2006
Vasant Vishvanath Mandke .. Petitioner.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income-
tax, III & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.M.K. Kulkarni for the petitioner.
Mr.S.R. Chauhan i/by Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the
respondents.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner
states that as of date the reassessment order has
already been served after reopening of the
assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
3. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with
liberty to approach appropriate authority to
challenge the reassessment order.
2
4. Hence, the petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and dismissed as such with liberty as
aforesaid.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue