Wp/871/2012 Of M/S.robo India Finance Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax, Circle-1(3)
High Court
09 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/871/2012 Of M/S.robo India Finance Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax, Circle-1(3)
Date of order
09 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/871/2012 Of M/S.robo India Finance Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax, Circle-1(3), the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.871 OF 2012
M/s.Rabo India Finance Limited, MumbaiV/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-1(3), Mumbai & Ors.
....Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr.Percy Pardiwalla, Senior Counsel with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATE : 9TH JULY, 2012.
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
P.C. :-
1.Rule. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.
2.For the reasons separately recorded in Writ Petition
No.870 of 2012, we have allowed that petition. This writ petition is also accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer (a).
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue