Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8747/2005 Of M/S. Choudhary Frieght C...

Wp/8747/2005 Of M/S. Choudhary Frieght Carriers v. Commissioner Of Income - Tax (Iv) And Ors

High Court 19 Dec 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/8747/2005 Of M/S. Choudhary Frieght Carriers v. Commissioner Of Income - Tax (Iv) And Ors
Date of order
19 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/8747/2005 Of M/S. Choudhary Frieght Carriers v. Commissioner Of Income - Tax (Iv) And Ors, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8747 OF 2005 M/s.Chowdhary Frieght Carriers .. .. Petitioner v/s. The Commissioner of Income tax & anr. .. .. Respondents Mr.K.Gopal i/by Inter Asia Lawyers for petitioner. Mr.Ashok Kontangale for respondents. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19th December 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Gopal in support of this Petition. Mr.Kotangale appears for the respondents. 2. The assessment of the petitioner-Firm has been transferred from Solapur to Jodhpur. This is purely an administrative decision. That apart, there are justifiable reasons inasmuch as the controlling partner is in Jodhpur and the business is entirely run from Jodhpur as is seen from the decision of the authorities concerned. Petition is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan