Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8753/2025 Of Shimogga Urban Developme...

Wp/8753/2025 Of Shimogga Urban Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 02 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/8753/2025 Of Shimogga Urban Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/8753/2025 Of Shimogga Urban Development Authority v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid memo.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitallysigned byCHANDANAB MLocation:High Courtof Karnataka IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 8753 OF 2025 (TIT) BETWEEN: SHIMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS 'SHIMOGGA BHADRAVATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY' (A GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY SET UP BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDER URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1 FLOOR, SUDA COMPLEX, 100 FEET ROAD, VINOBANAGARA, SHIMOGGA – 577 204. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER VISHWANATH P. MUDDAJJI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) SHIMOGGA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PAN NO. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND TPS, SHIMOGA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHIMOGA NO.75, 100 FEE ROAD, GOPAL GOWDA EXTENSION, SHIVAMOGGA, KARNATAKA – 577 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE) - 2 - THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CALLING FOR THE RECORDS OF THE PETITIONERS CASE AND AFTER EXAMINING THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY THEREOF BE PLEASED TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN ITA NO. 57/BANG/2024 ANNEXURE-D AS WELL AS THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 154 OF THE ACT DATED 30.10.2020 IN DIN NO. CPC/1920/U7/2011214964 (ANNEXURE-B) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date, which reads as under: “The Advocate for petitioner respectfully submits that it may be permitted to withdraw the above Writ Petition and permitted to file and Income Tax Appeal before the appropriate Bench to meet the ends of justice.” 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid memo. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan