Wp/879/2016 Of Sodexo Svc India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds),2(2) And Union Of India
High Court
23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/879/2016 Of Sodexo Svc India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds),2(2) And Union Of India
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/879/2016 Of Sodexo Svc India Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds),2(2) And Union Of India, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION(L)NO.826 OF 2016WITHWRIT PETITION(L)NO.827 OF 2016
Sodexo SVC Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner
VersusDeputy Commissioner of Income-Tax(TDS), 2(2) & Anr...Respondents
...........
Mr. Jehangir Mistry, Senior Counsel, Mr. Hiten Chanda, Ms. Khooshnum D. and Mr. Y. Jijina i/b. Mulla & Mulla for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for Respondent no.1.Mr. B. M. Chatterji, Senior Advocate, Vijay Killedar and Ranit Basu for Respondent no.2.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 23RD MARCH, 2016
P.C.:
1.Both these Petitions have been filed challenging numerous Notices dated 9[th] March, 2016 and 22[nd] February, 2016 issued under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act seeking to assess the Petitioner for failing to deduct tax at source in respect of F.Y. 2008-09 and F.Y. 2015-16. Mr. Mistry, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that pending the admission of these Petitions, Assessing Officer has passed an order dated 9[th] March, 2016 in respect of the impugned notices under
1/2
Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act in respect of F.Y. 2008-09 to 2015-
16.
2.In view of the above, the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw these Petitions with liberty to file fresh Petition, if so advised.
3.Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.