Case LawHigh Court › Wp/8847/2019 Of M/S. Sri Krishna General...

Wp/8847/2019 Of M/S. Sri Krishna General Trading Company v. The Prl. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/8847/2019 Of M/S. Sri Krishna General Trading Company v. The Prl. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/8847/2019 Of M/S. Sri Krishna General Trading Company v. The Prl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Having regard to the facts and submissions and recording the submissions of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M. SEETHARAMA MURTI AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI WRIT PETITION No.8847 of 2019 ORDER: (Per Honourable Sri Justice M.Seetharama Murti) When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner instructed to withdraw this writ petition for availing the remedy of appeal, i.e., the alternative remedy available to the petitioner and therefore, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy. However, he stated that the alternative remedy would be availed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till then, the interests of the petitioner may be protected. 2. We have heard the submissions of learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned standing counsel would submit that in the event, the time for preferring the appeal had already lapsed, the petitioner would be required to file the proposed appeal with an application for condonation of delay and that it is for the Tribunal to consider to grant or not to grant an interim order. 4. Having regard to the facts and submissions and recording the submissions of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for. Till a period of two weeks’ time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive action pursuant to the orders, which are impugned in this writ petition. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J 27[th] August, 2019 spr/ghn _____________ J.UMA DEVI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan