Wp/8881/2015 Of M/S Janani Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/8881/2015 Of M/S Janani Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/8881/2015 Of M/S Janani Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: O| Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF MARCH, 20109
BEREROR
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR.
!WRIT PETITION NO. 8881/2015 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S JANANI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., NO.24, IST MAIN ROAD,NKRAR BHASHYAM CIRCLEPETROL PUMP,VYALIKAVAL|BENGALURU-560 OOS. PAN: AABCJ /3/1HREPRESENIED BYMANAGING DIRBCTORSRI. N.V.S.MURTHYAGED ABOUT 58 YRBARS._. PRHTITIONBR
(BY Dr. C.P. RAMASWAMI FOR|SRI BALRAM R. RAO ADVOCATES) |SRI BALRAM R. RAO ADVOCATES) |
AND:
1.THER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONBROF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), 3 KRLOORCENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN'S ROAD,BENGALURU-560 OO1..OF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), 3 KRLOORCENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN'S ROAD,BENGALURU-560 OO1..
|THR ADDL. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAXCENTRAL RANGE-1,' KFLOORCENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN’S ROAD,INCOME TAXCENTRAL RANGE-1,' KFLOORCENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN’S ROAD,
BBRBNGALURU-560 OO1
3.|DEPUTY COMMISSIONER.
OF INCOME TAX.
CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), 3 KRLOORCENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN’S ROAD,CENTRAL REVENUES BUILDING,QUEEN’S ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 OO1.
RESPONDENTS|
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND|22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TOQUASH AS FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BYAN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NAITURE OFCERTIORARI OR ORTHERWISE, THE IMPUGNED NOTICEISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT1961 DATED 28.03.2014 VIDE ANN-A ORDER PASSED INDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME TAX CEHENIRCIRCLE 1(1)..
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY|HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THEKROLLOWING:
ORDER
Dr.C.P.Ramaswami, learned Advocate appearing
for petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time,|seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and to|pursue his grievance before jurisdictional Assessing|Officer. A memo is filed to the said effect. Said memo jisplaced on record.
O|
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
It is made clear that no opinion is expressed onthe contentions raised. All contentions of the parties|
are left open.|
Registry is directed to return Annexures-A & B onsame being substituted with duly attested photocopies. —
Sd/-
JUDGE
r1<
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue