Case Law › High Court › Wp/8937/1996 Of Vijayawada Sharre Dealer...

Wp/8937/1996 Of Vijayawada Sharre Dealers Association, (Vsda) (Regd.) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Jan 2006 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

30 Jan 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/8937/1996 Of Vijayawada Sharre Dealers Association, (Vsda) (Regd.) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT PETITION No.8937 of 1996 Between: Vijayawada Share Dealers’ Association (VSDA) (Regd.), 4[th] floor, Imdad Ghar, Opp: Head Post Office,Vijayawada – 520 001. AND ..... PETITIONER 1 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-III (TDS)Bandar Road, Near PWD Grounds,Vijayawada- 520 002, and another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki,) The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of theCourt to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (Bilal Nazki, J) 30[th] January, 2006 --------------------------- (D.Appa Rao, J) LUR ---------------------------

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.