Case Law › High Court › Wp/9082/2002 Of K.taraka Rama Krishna v....

Wp/9082/2002 Of K.taraka Rama Krishna v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 23 Jan 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

23 Jan 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/9082/2002 Of K.taraka Rama Krishna v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shallstand closed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.9082 OF 2002 ORDER:(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy) When the matter is called today, there is no representation forthe petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursuethe matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shallstand closed. No costs. _______________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY ___________________________________ JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA 23[rd] January, 2014MD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA MD WRIT PETITION No.9082 OF 2002(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy) 23[rd] January, 2014

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.