Case Law › High Court › Wp/926/2022 Of Saifee Burhani Upliftment...

Wp/926/2022 Of Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemption Circle 2 Mumbai And 2 Ors

High Court 20 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/926/2022 Of Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemption Circle 2 Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned by1/1MEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2022.04.22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY10:58:49+0530ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO. 926 OF 2022 Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxExemption Circle 2 Mumbai & Ors. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Riyaz Padvekar a/w Mr. Tanzil Padvekar for PetitionerMr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.R. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 20[th] APRIL 2022 N.R. BORKAR, JJ P.C. : 1After the petition was heard for sometime, Mr. Padvekar requestedthat leave be given to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all pointsbefore the concerned authority. 2Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.