Wp/9299/2019 Of Karnataka Hindi Prachara Samithi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/9299/2019 Of Karnataka Hindi Prachara Samithi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/9299/2019 Of Karnataka Hindi Prachara Samithi v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 2 DAY OF MARCH, 2019
BEFORE:
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.9299/2019 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA HINDI.PRACHARA SAMITHI(No.7, 3 CROSS.1[Si]BLOCK, JAYANAGARBBENGALURU — 560 O11(PAN No. )REPRESHNIED BY SRI. SHIVAREDDYGBRNBRAL SKBCRETARY
_. PRHTITIONBER
|BY SRI MALLAHA RAO K, ADV.|
AND:
1]THE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOMB TAXCHNITRAL REVENUE BUILDINGCHNITRAL REVENUE BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD, BEHIND GPO
BANGALORE — 560 OO1.
«|THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS) WARD - 1$ FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXP. KALINGA RAO ROAD)BENGALURU — 560 O27.(EXEMPTIONS) WARD - 1$ FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXP. KALINGA RAO ROAD)BENGALURU — 560 O27.
_ RESPONDENTS
IBY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.,)
THIS WRIT PETITION [IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &22/7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THEIMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.10.2016 PASSED BY THE R2,
PASSED UNDER SECTION 143(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR,THR RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YBAR 2015-16 VIDE ANNEXURE —CAND EIC., —
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING|IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ
petition. |
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
PMR
Sd/-—
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.