Case LawHigh Court › Wp/938/2016 Of Piramal Realty Pvt Ltd v....

Wp/938/2016 Of Piramal Realty Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-7(3)(2) And 3 Ors

High Court 06 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/938/2016 Of Piramal Realty Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-7(3)(2) And 3 Ors
Date of order
06 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/938/2016 Of Piramal Realty Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-7(3)(2) And 3 Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4.The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 947 OF 2016 Piramal Realty Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax-7(3)(2),Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Counsel a/w Niraj Seth, Atul Jasani for the petitioner Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 6[th] APRIL, 2016. P.C. 1.This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India essentially challenges Communications dated 11[th] March, 2016 and 18[th ]March, 2016 by the Assessing Officer to the petitioner. By the above communication, the petitioner was called upon to pay 15% of the demand assessed by the Assessing Officer by his order dated 30[th ]March, 2015 in respect of the Assessment Year 2012-13. This demand was made even though the petitioner's application dated 24[th] February, 2016 for stay of demand under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the Commissioner of Income Tax was awaiting disposal. 2.Mr. Mohanty, learned Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, states that the Assessing Officer will not act upon his Communications dated 11[th] March, 2016 and 18[th] March, 2016 till the disposal of the petitioner's application dated 24[th] February, 2016 by the Commissioner of Income Tax and for a period of one week thereafter from the date of of the communication of the order to the petitioner. 3.In view of the above statement, Mr. Mistri, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave as prayed for is granted. 4.The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan