Wp/9445/2022 Of Sivakumaran Pugazhendhi v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/9445/2022 Of Sivakumaran Pugazhendhi v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2014-2015
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/9445/2022 Of Sivakumaran Pugazhendhi v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the result, the impugned order is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Sivakumaran Pugazhendi,No.70, Raja Agraharam Street,Poonamallee,Chennai – 600 056.... Petitioner
The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/
Income-tax Officer,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi.... Respondent
PRAYER:-Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call forthe records pertaining to the impugned penalty order dated16[th] February, 2022 bearing Document Identification NumberITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2021-22/1039816731(1)passedbytherespondent under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 forthe Assessment Year 2014-15 by the respondent and quash thesame.
For Petitioner :M/s.T.V.Muthu AbiramiFor Respondent : Mrs.Hema MuralikrishnanSenior Standing Counsel
The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of Certiorari,to quash the impugned penalty order dated 16[th] February 2022bearing Document Identification Number ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2021-22/1039816731(1) passed by the respondent under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. In respect of the Assessment Year 2014-2015 against thepetitioner/assessee order of assessment dated 23.11.2019 waspassed by the Revenue under the Income Tax Act, 1961[in short,“the Act”].
3. Against the same, suo motu revision had been taken bythe Principal Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act, wherethe Principal Commissioner having set aside the Assessment Orderdated 23.11.2019 remitted the matter back to the AssessingAuthority for re-assessment, the re-assessment process is goingon as of now.
4. When that being so, pursuant to the earlier AssessmentOrder dated 23.11.2019, since already penalty proceedings wasinitiated, that has now been imposed in the present order, whichwas issued under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 16.02.2022,which is impugned herein.
5. Heard Ms.Muthu Abirami, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner and Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned SeniorStanding Counsel appearing for the respondent.
6. Since the very Assessment Order itself has been setaside and re-assessment process is going on, the question of anypenalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, does not ariseat this juncture. Therefore on that ground, I am inclined to setaside the order, which is impugned herein.
7. In the result, the impugned order is set aside. However,it is open to the Revenue to complete the re-assessment at theearliest point of time. It is needless to mention that,depending upon the outcome of the decision to be made in the re-assessment, the further course of action can be taken.
8. With the above observation, this Writ Petition isdisposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions aredismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mp
To
The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income-tax Officer,National Faceless Assessment Centre,New Delhi.
+1cc to M/s.T.V.Muthu Abirami, Advocate, S.R.No.28587
+1cc to Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.27867
W.P.NO.9445 OF 2022
AK-II(CO)PBS/06/05/2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.