Case LawHigh Court › Wp/9576/2023 Of Mr. M Pavan v. The Incom...

Wp/9576/2023 Of Mr. M Pavan v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 30 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/9576/2023 Of Mr. M Pavan v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
30 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/9576/2023 Of Mr. M Pavan v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned bySHARADAVANI BLocation:HIGH COURTOFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF AUGUST, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT -WRIT PETITION NO. 9576 OF 2023 (TIT) BETWEEN: MR. M PAVAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O K MUNIRAJU, RESIDING AT GIRIDHAR, SHANIMAHATAM TEMPLE ROAD, DEVASANDRA, KRISHNARAJAPURA POST, BENGALURU-560 036. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARTHIK V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(3)(3), BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. 2.PRINICPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. 3.CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 002. REPRESENTED HERDIN BY ITS CHAIRPERSON - 2 - 4.PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA AND GOA REGION, GROUND FLOOR, CR BUILDING, NO.1, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 14.3.2023 BEARING DIN.ITBA/PNL/S/27IF/2022-23/1050733254(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-1 NO.1, 2 U/S 274 R/W SECTION 271F OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE.G. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 30.08.2023 seeking disposal of the Writ petition as having been withdrawn as not pressed. Memo is placed on record. The said Memo reads as under: “The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit to the Petitioner to withdraw the above Petition with liberty to challenge the assessment order. Since in the present petition challenges only the consequential order, hence same may be permit to withdraw in the interest of justice and equity.” NC: 2023:KHC:31066 WP No. 9576 of 2023 Writ petition is disposed off as having been withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Snb/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan