In Wp/965/2014 Of Ani Anu Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3) And Anr, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2022.02.1511:34:51+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.965 OF 2014WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2014WITHWRIT PETITION NO.969 OF 2014WITHWRIT PETITION NO.988 OF 2014
Ani Anu Developers Pvt Ltd. ….Petitioner V/s.Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3) & Anr…Respondents
----
None for Petitioner
Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Mr. P. A. Narayanan for Respondents/Revenue
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
N.J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED : 11[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1None appeared for petitioner yesterday. Even today, nobody ispresent for petitioner.
2Therefore, petitions dismissed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.