Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr
High Court
19 Jan 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr
Date of order
19 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of this order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9818 OF 2004
Mr.Manubhai Hargovandas Patel .. Petitioner.
V/s.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at
Mumbai & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.S.S. Jani for the petitioner.
Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mrs.S.V.
Bharucha for the respondents.
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2005.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. By this petition, the petitioner is
challenging the order dated 8th November, 2004
whereby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Bench had kept the appeal for final hearing on 11th
November, 2004 and had also observed that till then
no coercive measures for the recovery of the demand
to be adopted by the department. It appears that in
the meanwhile this petition has been filed. In view
thereof, the Tribunal seems to have not proceeded
with the hearing of the appeal.
2
3. Under these circumstances, we direct both the
petitioner and the respondent No.2 to approach the
Tribunal to take a fixed date of hearing to get the
above appeal disposed of as expeditiously as possible
preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
During the period when the above appeal is pending,
no coercive measures will be taken against the
petitioner.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of in terms
of this order.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.