Case LawHigh Court › Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Pat...

Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr

High Court 19 Jan 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr
Date of order
19 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/9818/2004 Of Manubhai Hargovandas Patel v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of this order.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9818 OF 2004 Mr.Manubhai Hargovandas Patel .. Petitioner. V/s. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai & Others .. Respondents. Mr.S.S. Jani for the petitioner. Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mrs.S.V. Bharucha for the respondents. CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2005. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 8th November, 2004 whereby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench had kept the appeal for final hearing on 11th November, 2004 and had also observed that till then no coercive measures for the recovery of the demand to be adopted by the department. It appears that in the meanwhile this petition has been filed. In view thereof, the Tribunal seems to have not proceeded with the hearing of the appeal. 2 3. Under these circumstances, we direct both the petitioner and the respondent No.2 to approach the Tribunal to take a fixed date of hearing to get the above appeal disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from today. During the period when the above appeal is pending, no coercive measures will be taken against the petitioner. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of this order. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan