Case Law › High Court › Wp/9843/1999 Of Subhash Gupta, Legal Rep...

Wp/9843/1999 Of Subhash Gupta, Legal Representative v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh

High Court 26 Sep 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

26 Sep 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/9843/1999 Of Subhash Gupta, Legal Representative v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIAnd THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.9843 OF 1999 Dated: 26.09.2013 Between: Subhash GuptaAnd .. Petitioner The Chief Commissioner of Income Taxand another .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIAnd THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.9843 OF 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini) It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner thatthe cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Nocosts. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in thisWrit Petition shall stand closed. ____________ G.ROHINI, J _______________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: 26.09.2013Ivd

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.