Wp v. Pr.commissioner Of Incometax- I And 3 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJl WRIT PETITION NO: 9947 OF 2021 Between: Bhagyanagar Copper Pvt.Ltd, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Director Devendra Surana. ...PETITIONER AND 1.Pr.Commissioner of Incometax- l, Hyderabad 2.Pr.Commissioner of lncometax, Mumbai-1 3.Pr.Commissioner of lncometax, Central, Chennai-'14.DCIT, Central Circle [-1( ]t ) Chennai4.DCIT, Central Circle [-1( ]t ) Chennai ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia [praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed [therewith, ]the [High Court ][may ][be]pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ, order ordirection declaring the Respondents act of transferring the [petitioners ][file ][bearing]PAN. from the [jurisdiction ]of Respondent No.2 [to ]the [jurisdiction of]Respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary , unreasonable and [hit by ]article [14 ][of ][the]Constitution of lndia and also section 127 [of ]the [l.T.Act ][consequently direct ][the]petitioners file be transferred to Respondent No.1 at Hyderabad and set aside theorder uls.127(2) dl.22l3l2o21 of the lncome-tax [Act.] IA NO: 10F 2021 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the (;ircumstances stated inthe affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High corrrt may be preased tosuspend the operation of the transfer of the petitioner,s fire from jurisdiction ofRespondent No 2 to Respondent No.4 and consequenry stay a, proceedings inthe petitioner's fire bearing writ petition.'AN.AAHCA0246Q, [pending ][rJisposal ][of the ][above] Counsel for the petitioner : SRI Y.RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI J.V.PRASAD, SENIOR STANDING COUNSELThe Court made the foltowing: ORDER, SENIOR STANDING COUNSELThe Court made the foltowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [P.SAM ] AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [N.TUKARAMJI]w.P. No.9947 [of2O2L] ORDER:6,,, l()tt'l)lt' [:;n ][Jttst ('t'P-SAM ][KosHY)] lleard Mr.Y.Ratnakar, [learned ][counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner ][and]Mr.J.V.Prasad, leamed Senior [Standing Counsel ][for ][the ][respondent']Perused the material [available on ][record.] 2. The instant [writ ][petition ][has been ][fited ][challenging the ][transfer ][of]the petitioner's file lrom [the ][jurisdiction ][of ][2nd ][respondent ][to ][the]jurisdiction of 4'h respondent. 3. Meanwhile, there [was a request made ][by ][the ][petitioner ][be ][lore ][the]authorities concemed lor [transf'er ][of ][frles ][to ][the ][authoriry ][having]jurisdiction at Hyderabad. 4. Today, when the matter [is ][taken up ][flor ][hearing, ][leamed counsel ][for]the petitioner submits [that ][he ][has ][instructions ][that respondent authorities]have since passed an [order ][transferring the ][files to ][Hyderabad and ][the]matter now stands redressed. 5. Given the said [submission by the leamed counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner,]we are of the considered opinion [that ][the ][substantial grievance ][of ][the]petitioner stands redressed. [[n view ][of ][the ][same, ][nothing further ][rernains] II to be ad.ludicated in the instant rvrit petition and the same is accordingly disposed of w 6. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No order as to costs A\u. HIGH COURT DATED:0911112023 ORDER WP.No.9947 of 2021 r t-- Oav',aa-:)t-, t [I]c1'r [IJi:t ][2tlJ],)4+1--l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS \l,\'f6\ tl{r'