Case LawHigh Court › + W.p.(C) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Inco...

+ W.p.(C) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 16 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+ W.p.(C) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
16 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In + W.p.(C) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 132, Section 153C of the Income-tax Act.

Issue: Further, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide order 28.08.2025 has directed you to seek instructions from the department on whether the notice under section 153C of the Act will be withdrawn/ dropped

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12698/2024, CM APPL. 52865/2024 SABENA PURI ( THROUGH CONSTITUTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. DILIP BHAGTANI ).....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mansa Anand, Mr. Sohum Dua, Mr. Abhyudaya Bajpayee and Mr. Vikram Chowdhary, Adv. SABENA PURI ( THROUGH CONSTITUTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. DILIP BHAGTANI ).....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mansa Anand, Mr. Sohum Dua, Mr. Abhyudaya Bajpayee and Mr. Vikram Chowdhary, Adv. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhaita, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann and Mr. P. Gupta, JSCs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARO R D E R16.09.2025 % 1.Pursuant to the order dated 28.08.2025, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia has received instructions from the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, 20, New Delhi vide the communication dated 15.09.2025. The same reads as under:- “2. A search and seizure action under Section 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Moser Bear Group and others on 07.04.2019. During the course of the search and seizure action at 43B, Okhla Phase-III, New Delhi, certain incriminating documents (pages from 01 to 92 of Annexure A-1') related to purchase of land and payments in cash were found and seized. 3. On the basis of the above information, and after recording satisfaction note, notice(s) u/s 153C were issued to the aforesaid assessee for the AY-2014-15 to 2020-21 on 31.03.2024. 4. In response to the notice(s) u/s 153C, the petitioner filed writ petitions (W.P.(C) 12698/2024) for the AYs 2015-16 to 2020-21 before Hon'ble Delhi High Court, challenging the legality of notice(s) u/s 153C issued in her case. 4(a). In response to the writ petitions, your office requested the department to submit para-wise comments with respect to the writ petition. In response to the same, a note was shared with you vide letter F. No. DCIT/CC-20/2025-26/434 dated 12.08.2025 stating that in absence of any incriminating material, the case of the assessee shall be completed on last assessed income without making any additions. 4(b). Further, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide order 28.08.2025 has directed you to seek instructions from the department on whether the notice under section 153C of the Act will be withdrawn/ dropped. 4(c). In this regard, it is stated that the case of the assessee was re-opened u/s 153C of the Act according to the law in force at the time of issuance of notice. However, in compliance of the judgements delivered in the cases of M/s Abhisar Buildwell Pvt Ltd, M/s UK Paints (Overseas) Ltd. & Saksham Commodities Ltd., and in the absence of incriminating material in the case of the Petitioner/assessee, the assessment proceeding will be dropped. 5.The above is for your kind information and necessary action.” 2.According to him, as per his instructions, in the absence of the incriminating material in the case of petitioner, the assessment proceedings will be dropped. If that be so, we by taking on record the stand taken by the respondents vide the aforesaid communication, to drop the proceedings, direct appropriate order(s) be passed within a period of three weeks from today. 3. In the eventuality, the order(s) is not passed within three weeks, liberty shall be with the petitioner to file an application seeking revival of the writ petition. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 cd VINOD KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan