+ W.p.(C) v. Income Tax Officer Ward 25(1) & Ors

$~4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 14463/2025 CM APPL. 59227/2025TENERON LTDTENERON LTD .....Petitioner Through:Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta TranaPanda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs.Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 25(1) & ORS. .....RespondentThrough:Mr. Sunil Agarwal, SSC, Mr. ViplavAcharya, JSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC,Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari and Mr. AnugrahDwivedi, AdvsAcharya, JSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC,Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari and Mr. AnugrahDwivedi, Advs CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R23.09.2025 % 1.On the last date of hearing, Mr. Sunil Agarwal, learned SSC hadsought some time to take instructions. As per his instructions, therectification application for which one of the prayers has been made i.e.,prayer (ii), the said application is not traceable in the department, and theOfficer concerned has requested that the petitioner may furnish a copy of theapplication as filed for a decision thereof. 2.Mr. Satyen Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the saidapplication annexed with this petition as Annexure P-5 shall be filed beforethe Officer within one week from today. 3.If that be so, the Assessing Officer shall decide the rectificationapplication within four weeks from the date of receipt of the same.application within four weeks from the date of receipt of the same. 4.It goes without saying, if the petitioner has any grievance against theorder to be passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it canseek such remedy as available in law.order to be passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it canseek such remedy as available in law. 5.Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. 6.The pending application is also disposed of. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2025RK VINOD KUMAR, J