Case LawHigh Court › + W.p.(C) v. Assistant Commissioner Of I...

+ W.p.(C) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 25 Delhi A Orsnd

High Court 12 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+ W.p.(C) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 25 Delhi A Orsnd
Date of order
12 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In + W.p.(C) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 25 Delhi A Orsnd, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal under Section 148, Section 153C of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 8.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17162/2024 CM APPL. 72849/2024 CM APPL. 72850/2024 PANCH TATVA PROMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Agarwal, Mr. Dushyant Agarwal, Advocates. PANCH TATVA PROMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Agarwal, Mr. Dushyant Agarwal, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 25 DELHI A ORSND .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Senior Standing Counsel, Ms. Anuja Pethia, JSC, Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz, Mr. Srikant Singh, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAO R D E R12.12.2024 % 1. Issue notice. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 2.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the notice dated 28.08.2024 issued under Section 153C (hereafter the impugned notice) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) seeking to reopen the assessment in respect of the assessment year (AY) 2015-16. 3.The petitioner’s case is that the impugned notice has been issued beyond the period of the limitation. 4.Concededly, the issue involved in the present case is covered by the earlier decision of this court in Dinesh Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 20, Delhi & Others: Neutral Citation: 2024: DHC:4554-DB as well as the decision in the case of The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central-1 v. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd : Neutral Citation : 2024:DHC: 2629-DB and KAD Housing Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-6, Delhi : Neutral Citation : 2024:DHC:8214-DB. 5. In terms of the aforesaid decisions, the period of ten years is required to be reckoned from the end of the assessment year, which is relevant to the previous year in which the notice under Section 148 of the Act has been issued. 6.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue concurs with the aforesaid proposition. 7. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. The impugned notice is set aside as being barred by limitation. 8.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending applications also stand disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ DECEMBER 12, 2024 KG TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan