+ W.p.(C) 1801/2025 And Cm Appl. 8668/2025 Dlf Midtown Private Limited v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Transfer Pricing Delhi 1(2)(1) & Ors
High Court
01 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+ W.p.(C) 1801/2025 And Cm Appl. 8668/2025 Dlf Midtown Private Limited v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Transfer Pricing Delhi 1(2)(1) & Ors
Date of order
01 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In + W.p.(C) 1801/2025 And Cm Appl. 8668/2025 Dlf Midtown Private Limited v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Transfer Pricing Delhi 1(2)(1) & Ors, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~70
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 1801/2025 and CM APPL. 8668/2025DLF MIDTOWN PRIVATE LIMITEDDLF MIDTOWN PRIVATE LIMITED
.....PetitionerThrough:Ms Kavita Jha, Sr Advocate with MrVaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates.
versus
DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTRANSFER PRICING DELHI 1(2)(1) & ORS.
.....RespondentsThrough:MrIndrujSinghRai,SSC,MrSanjeev Menon, Mr Rahul Singh,JSCs, Mr Anmol Jagga, Mr GauravKumarandMsVarshaSharmaAdvocates for the Revenue.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAO R D E R01.04.2025
%
1.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdrawthe present petition. He states that the order under Section 263 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 pursuant to which the Transfer Pricing Officer order waspassed has been set aside by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and,therefore, the petitioner’s grievance stands addressed.
2.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pendingapplication is also stands disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
APRIL 01, 2025
M
TEJAS KARIA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue