+W.p.(C) 2426/2021Desh Bhushan Jaindesh Bhushan Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralcircle 16 & Anr
High Court
17 Oct 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+W.p.(C) 2426/2021Desh Bhushan Jaindesh Bhushan Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralcircle 16 & Anr
Date of order
17 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In +W.p.(C) 2426/2021Desh Bhushan Jaindesh Bhushan Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Centralcircle 16 & Anr, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.If that be so, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. V
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~102
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(C) 2426/2021DESH BHUSHAN JAINDESH BHUSHAN JAIN
.....Petitioner
Through:Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALCIRCLE 16 & ANR.
.....RespondentsThrough:Mr Sanjay Kumar, SSC, Ms MonicaBenjaminandMs EashaKadian,JSCs for the Revenue.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R%14.10.2025
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite her bestefforts, she is unable to get instructions from the petitioner.
2.If that be so, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
OCTOBER 14, 2025/sr
VINOD KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue