Case LawHigh Court › + W.p.(C) 584/2025 Nokia Solutions And N...

+ W.p.(C) 584/2025 Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited Formerly Known As Alcatel Lucent India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16 1 & Anr

High Court 08 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
+ W.p.(C) 584/2025 Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited Formerly Known As Alcatel Lucent India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16 1 & Anr
Date of order
08 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In + W.p.(C) 584/2025 Nokia Solutions And Networks India Private Limited Formerly Known As Alcatel Lucent India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 16 1 & Anr, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ 46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 584/2025 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS ALCATEL LUCENT INDIA LIMITED NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS ALCATEL LUCENT INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Mr. Nikhil Agarwal and Mr. Purv Medhira, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 16 1 & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Parth Samwal, JSCs and Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Nischay Purohit, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R08.09.2025 % 1.This application is filed with the following prayers: “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to give effect to the order of Transfer Pricing Officer dated 01.03.2018, and release consequential refunds along with applicable statutory interest under section 244A within a period of 4 weeks;” 2. In effect, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1, to give effect to the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) dated 01.03.2018 and release the consequential benefits. 01.03.2018 and release the consequential benefits. 3.Suffice will it be to state that this petition shall be considered as representation on behalf of the petitioner and a decision thereon shall be taken by the respondents within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order as an outer limit. Further action, if any will be taken in accordance with law. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 ss VINOD KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan